- HOME
- WOMANKIND LINKS
- WOMANKIND MANIFESTO
- Manifesto 1
- Manifesto 2
- Manifesto 3
- Manifesto 4
- Manifesto 5
- Manifesto 6
- Manifesto 7
- Manifesto 8
- Manifesto 9
- Manifesto 10>
- WOMANKIND POLITICS>
- NEW YORK>
- WEB WANDERINGS>
- CONTRIBUTORS
- 5_16_2012
- 5_15_2012
- 5_14_2012
- 5_13_2012
- 5_12_2012
- 5_11_2012
- 5_10_2012
- 5_9_2012
- 5_8_2012
- 5_7_2012
- 5_6_2012
- 5_5_2012
- 5_4_2012
- 5_3_2012
- 5_2_2012
- 5_1_2012
- WOMANKIND WEB WANDERINGS ARCHIVES>
- 4_30_2012
- 4_27_2012
- 4_26_2012
- 4_25_2012
- 4_24_2012
- 4_23_2012
- 4_22_2012
- 4_21_2012
- 4_20_2012
- 4_19_2012
- 4_18_2012
- 4_17_2012
- 4_15_2012
- 4_14_2012
- 4_13_2012
- 4_12_2012
- 4_11_2012
- 4_10_2012
- 4_9_2012
- 4_8_2012
- 4_7_2012
- 4_6_2012
- 4_5_2012
- 4_1_2012
- 3_31_2012
- 3_30_2012
- 3_29_2012
- 3_28_2012
- 3_27_2012
- 3_26_2012
- 3_25_2012
- 3_24_2012
- 3_23_2012
- 3_22_2012
- 3_21_2012
- 3_20_2012
- 3_19_2012
- 3_18_2012
- 3_17_2012
- 3_16_2012
- 3_15_2012
- 3_14_2012
- 3_13_2012
- 3_12_2012
- 3_11_2012
- 3_10_2012
- 3_9_2012
- 3_8_2012
- 3_7_2012
- 3_6_2012
- 3_5_2012
- 3_3_2012
- 3_2_2012
- 3_1_2012
- 2_29_12
- 2_28_12
- 2_27_12
- 2_26_12
- 2_25_12
- 4_30_2012
- CONTRIBUTORS
- WEB WANDERINGS>
- NEW YORK>
- Manifesto 1
- OKIES, TACOS AND NUNS
- Dedication
- Table of Contents
- Prologue
- Just Mama and Me
- Just Me
- BOOK 1
- BOOK 1 TOC>
- BOOK 2
- BOOK 2 TOC>
- On Donax Street with Mama
- The Day of the Birds
- The Little House
- The Little House picture
- Neighbors
- Oklahoma Grandma
- Leo and Annabelle
- Picture Day with the Bird Man
- To Woody Woodpecker, With Love
- The Piano Day
- My Daddy
- Picture of Grandma
- The Bad Rooster
- Hero's
- Mouse In The Closet
- First Spanking
- Sex Education - Okie Style
- Uncle Leo's Big Mouth
- Measles, Mumps, Chicken Pops, Etc., Etc.
- The Last Rooster Crow
- A Fight With Mama
- On Donax Street with Mama
- BOOK 3
- BOOK 3 TOC>
- BOOK 4
- BOOK 4 TOC>
- Book 5
- Book 5 TOC>
- New Neighbors
- Kid Stuff
- Black Bees
- Pomegranates And Brooms
- The Goldfish Scandal
- I Win A Bet
- The Rooster And The Mailman
- Picture 75
- Tuesday Afternoon At The Cove
- The Power Of Prayer
- Picture 78
- The Sewing Box From Switzerland
- Big, Bad Richard
- Big Kid's Bike
- Picture 82
- The Blue Jeans That Were Black
- Christine Jorgensen - First Heroine
- Ray Schwinn
- Vacuum Cleaner Attack
- First Love
- Fruit Cocktail
- Lois Allen
- The Day Mama Cried
- Visiting Days
- Picture 185
- Best Friend Ever
- New Neighbors
- Book 6
- Book 6 TOC
- Full Moon in February
- POLITICAL WEB SITES
- FACEBOOK PAGES
- YOUTUBE>
- WOMANKIND EVENTS>
- Dedication
WEB WANDERINGS
4/5/2012
4:00 p.m. PST
4:00 p.m. PST
Nancy Summers-Long shared Political Loudmouth's photo.
Welcome to The Womankind blog.
All comments are welcome.
02/03/2012
0 Comments
What is woman-centered? Is it even a word? Can it be found in a dictionary? What does it mean? Who created the term? Where did it come from?
I first heard the word woman-centered in a classroom. The year was 1989; the class was "Intro to Women's Studies - 101." For some reason or other, I caught myself thinking of that term a few months ago and went immediately to my beloved and treasured computer to goggle. That word is in the Oxford online dictionary:
google Pronunciation: /ˈɡuːɡl/ verb [with object] informal search for information about (someone or something) on the Internet, typically using the search engine Google.
Origin: 1990s: from Google, the proprietary name of a popular Internet search engine
But "woman-centered" cannot be found in a dictionary. At least not in any of the online dictionaries I searched through two months ago. And I found this fact very strange because I had heard the word way back in 1986. I can tell you exactly who said it; it was Professor Bettina Aptheker in the lecture she gave on the first day of my "Intro" class. I was 36, a re-entry student at the University of California, Santa Cruz, - a single mother; a lesbian; a disabled student; a pot smoker and poet; a misogynist pig. My actual major was Literature/Creative Writing; I only took the Woman Studies class to get a friend off my back. Really!
I walked out of that first "Introduction to Women's Studies - 101" a very, very different woman from the one who walked in. And now here I am, some 26 years later at age 67, beginning a blog with the very first topic being about the word (or should I say non-word) "woman-centered."
I decided to make my search simpler and used the same online Oxford Dictionary. I discovered some very interesting definitions:
mankind noun [mass noun]
womankind Pronunciation: /ˈwʊmənkʌɪnd/ (also womenkind) noun [mass noun]women considered collectively: she said she acted for womankind in bringing a sexual harassment claim against him
Interesting. Mankind seems to define all of humankind, while womankind stands only for women collectively. Does that mean men are more important than women? Maybe I should go even simpler, down to the basic "man" and "woman"? I did so and found:
man Pronunciation: /man/ noun (plural men /mɛn/)
Well, that's a pretty detailed definition of the word "man." Let's see what we get for the word "woman."
woman Pronunciation: /ˈwʊmən/ noun (plural women /ˈwɪmɪn/)
Goodness, quite a difference in the depth and breadth of these two definitions. I wonder what impact these definitions might have on youngsters of either gender? We all are, in part, what we are taught. Seems to me the teachings in these definitions point to a reality that men are much more important than women. In fact, that is the reality in the United States: men are more important than women. How have we women allowed this to be? Is this the world we truly want? Really?
My next blog entry will be a continuation of the term woman-centered. Have a great day everyone and be gentle with yourselves.
In Sisterhood,
Blue
IMHO: One of the concepts I learned during my three years of Women's Studies was that of "internalized homophobia". I learned that basically I had hated myself for years because I was a lesbian despite the fact that I was marching in parades, was very "out", and was very active in the Lesbian community. There are lots of "internalized" prejudices that we carry around within ourselves as a result of the culture we're raised in: "internalized racism (probably what happened with Zimmerman as he is a "man of color" himself yet he killed a young black man), "internalized ageism", and so forth. What I don't understand is why women cannot seem to even begin to look at the fact that they themselves may be acting out of "internalized misogyny" when they tend to focus on events that happen to men rather than events that happen to women? "Internalized" anything can happen to the best and brightest of people. It's how we're raised, to put people in categories and determine from those "categories" what we want to focus on in our activism. And until we women learn to look at our own potential "internalized misogyny", we're not going to be effective in making any true social and political changes in our society because we're not focused on women like we should be. Our focus is pretty much on men. Look at what makes the news. Look at what makes the talk shows? Look at what we post on "Facebook". A historical example of this misogynous focus is the AIDS epidemic. Lesbians came storming out of the woodwork to help our brothers dying from AIDS. Yet we women never got the ERA passed during that similar time frame. Interesting but also, to me, extremely sad. We do for men and boys what we won't do for ourselves and our daughters.
All comments are welcome.
02/03/2012
0 Comments
What is woman-centered? Is it even a word? Can it be found in a dictionary? What does it mean? Who created the term? Where did it come from?
I first heard the word woman-centered in a classroom. The year was 1989; the class was "Intro to Women's Studies - 101." For some reason or other, I caught myself thinking of that term a few months ago and went immediately to my beloved and treasured computer to goggle. That word is in the Oxford online dictionary:
google Pronunciation: /ˈɡuːɡl/ verb [with object] informal search for information about (someone or something) on the Internet, typically using the search engine Google.
Origin: 1990s: from Google, the proprietary name of a popular Internet search engine
But "woman-centered" cannot be found in a dictionary. At least not in any of the online dictionaries I searched through two months ago. And I found this fact very strange because I had heard the word way back in 1986. I can tell you exactly who said it; it was Professor Bettina Aptheker in the lecture she gave on the first day of my "Intro" class. I was 36, a re-entry student at the University of California, Santa Cruz, - a single mother; a lesbian; a disabled student; a pot smoker and poet; a misogynist pig. My actual major was Literature/Creative Writing; I only took the Woman Studies class to get a friend off my back. Really!
I walked out of that first "Introduction to Women's Studies - 101" a very, very different woman from the one who walked in. And now here I am, some 26 years later at age 67, beginning a blog with the very first topic being about the word (or should I say non-word) "woman-centered."
I decided to make my search simpler and used the same online Oxford Dictionary. I discovered some very interesting definitions:
mankind noun [mass noun]
- 1 /manˈkʌɪnd/ human beings considered collectively; the human race: research for the benefit of all mankind
womankind Pronunciation: /ˈwʊmənkʌɪnd/ (also womenkind) noun [mass noun]women considered collectively: she said she acted for womankind in bringing a sexual harassment claim against him
Interesting. Mankind seems to define all of humankind, while womankind stands only for women collectively. Does that mean men are more important than women? Maybe I should go even simpler, down to the basic "man" and "woman"? I did so and found:
man Pronunciation: /man/ noun (plural men /mɛn/)
- 1an adult human male: a small man with mischievous eyes the men’s semi-finals
- a male member of a workforce, team, etc.: over 700 men were made redundant
- (men) ordinary members of the armed forces as distinct from the officers: he had a platoon of forty men to prepare for battle
- a husband or lover: the two of them lived for a time as man and wife
- [with modifier] a male person associated with a particular place, activity, or occupation: a Cambridge man I’m a solid Labour man
- a person with the qualities associated with males, such as bravery, spirit, or toughness: she was more of a man than any of them
- a male pursued or sought by another, especially in connection with a crime: Inspector Bull was sure they would find their man
- dated a manservant or valet: get me a cocktail, my man
- historical a vassal.
- 2a human being of either sex; a person: God cares for all men
- (also Man) [in singular] human beings in general; the human race: places untouched by the ravages of man
- [in singular, with adjective or noun modifier] a type of prehistoric human named after the place where the remains were found: Cro-Magnon man
- 3 (the Man) informal a group or person in a position of authority over others, such as a corporate employer or the police: they’ve mastered their emotive grunge-pop without haggling with the Man
- black slang white people collectively regarded as the controlling group in society: he urged that black college athletes boycott the Man’s Rose Bowl
- 4a figure or token used in playing a board game.
- 1(of personnel) work at, run, or operate (a place or piece of equipment) or defend (a fortification): the firemen manned the pumps and fought the blaze
- provide someone to fill (a post): the chaplaincy was formerly manned by the cathedral
- 2 archaic fortify the spirits or courage of: he manned himself with dauntless air
- used, irrespective of the sex of the person addressed, to express surprise, admiration, delight, etc., or for emphasis: wow, like cosmic, man
- 1a person compared to a figure made of straw; a sham.
- 2a person undertaking a financial commitment without adequate means.
- 1 in a direct and frank way between two men: he was able to talk man to man with the delegates
- 2 denoting a defensive tactic in soccer or other sport in which each player is responsible for marking one opponent: the best man-to-man marker in the game
Well, that's a pretty detailed definition of the word "man." Let's see what we get for the word "woman."
woman Pronunciation: /ˈwʊmən/ noun (plural women /ˈwɪmɪn/)
- an adult human female: a jury of seven women and five men [as modifier]: a woman doctor
- [with modifier] a female person associated with a particular place, activity, or occupation: one of his sophisticated London women
- a peremptory form of address to a woman: don’t be daft, woman!
- a female worker or employee.
- a female who is paid to clean someone’s house and carry out other domestic duties: a daily woman
- a man’s wife, girlfriend, or lover: he wondered whether Billy had his woman with him
Goodness, quite a difference in the depth and breadth of these two definitions. I wonder what impact these definitions might have on youngsters of either gender? We all are, in part, what we are taught. Seems to me the teachings in these definitions point to a reality that men are much more important than women. In fact, that is the reality in the United States: men are more important than women. How have we women allowed this to be? Is this the world we truly want? Really?
My next blog entry will be a continuation of the term woman-centered. Have a great day everyone and be gentle with yourselves.
In Sisterhood,
Blue
IMHO: One of the concepts I learned during my three years of Women's Studies was that of "internalized homophobia". I learned that basically I had hated myself for years because I was a lesbian despite the fact that I was marching in parades, was very "out", and was very active in the Lesbian community. There are lots of "internalized" prejudices that we carry around within ourselves as a result of the culture we're raised in: "internalized racism (probably what happened with Zimmerman as he is a "man of color" himself yet he killed a young black man), "internalized ageism", and so forth. What I don't understand is why women cannot seem to even begin to look at the fact that they themselves may be acting out of "internalized misogyny" when they tend to focus on events that happen to men rather than events that happen to women? "Internalized" anything can happen to the best and brightest of people. It's how we're raised, to put people in categories and determine from those "categories" what we want to focus on in our activism. And until we women learn to look at our own potential "internalized misogyny", we're not going to be effective in making any true social and political changes in our society because we're not focused on women like we should be. Our focus is pretty much on men. Look at what makes the news. Look at what makes the talk shows? Look at what we post on "Facebook". A historical example of this misogynous focus is the AIDS epidemic. Lesbians came storming out of the woodwork to help our brothers dying from AIDS. Yet we women never got the ERA passed during that similar time frame. Interesting but also, to me, extremely sad. We do for men and boys what we won't do for ourselves and our daughters.
in my rudyblue02@yahoo.com e-mail box:
Breaking from Newsmax.com
‘Caterpillargate’: A Meta-War Is Born
Sometimes pols don’t only make news, they start trends.
Reince Priebus, Republican National Committee chairman, probably had no such intentions. He was merely responding to Bloomberg’s Al Hunt on a question about that “war on women” that Republicans are accused of waging in the primary campaign (the one that has opened up a yawning gender gap in the party’s competition with the White House.)
“If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we’d have problems with caterpillars,” Priebus said in an interview airing this weekend on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt. “It’s a fiction.”
Fiction or not, that didn’t stop a chorus of tweets from giving birth to Washington’s newest “Gate.”
“I think someone compared women to powerful earth moving equipment,” tweeted Callie Schweitzer @cschweitz. “Hasn’t someone called an etymologist to weigh in on caterpillar gate yet?” asked Brian Beutler at Twitter.
The comments keep coming at #CaterpillarGate.
The ink-stained media also has caught on.
Pointing to a USA Today swing-state poll, the Wall Street Journal noted that the comment represents “the latest episode in a battle that apparently has allowed President Barack Obama and some other Democrats to build a lead among women and give them an advantage.”
NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell is on the case too, borrowing Bloomberg’s video for an afternoon broadcast at the top of her show, “Andrea Mitchell Reports.”
For the record, a caterpillar gate is a steel gate carried on crawler tracks. It is used to control water flow through a spillway — which apparently is what Priebus’ comment about caterpillars has opened on the Internet.
© 2012 Bloomberg. All rights reserved.
IMHO: I wonder if I can get "Andrea Mitchell Reports" on hulu.com? I'm going to go try when I'm done with this final updeate.
THE VOICES OF AMERICA'S WOMEN
Gadfly Granny shared Keith Olbermann Fan Page's photo.
Karen Oakley shared a link: "Fracking is bad news. Full stop."
Why Fracking is a Crime Against Women: Spontaneous Abortions, Breast Cancer, and Birth Defects
www.alternet.org
Why Fracking is a Crime Against Women: Spontaneous Abortions, Breast Cancer, and Birth Defects
www.alternet.org
*********************************************
Karen Oakley shared a link: "Is this really a secret? Didn't we always know?"
"Capitalism's Dirty Secret: Corporations Don't Create Jobs, They Destroy Them
|www.alternet.orgIf
If we want good jobs and long-term career opportunities, we have to tame the wild horses of big business.
*********************************************
Karen Oakley shared a link: "The key words are Christian RIGHT, fundies. And, of course, it's terrible."
"The Bully Backlash: How the Christian Right Is Attacking Efforts to Help Kids
|www.alternet.org
Even as states and schools try to put in place anti-bullying policies, the Christian right is mobilizing to undo them.
*********************************************
Karen Oakley shared a link: "Peaceful protest? PEPPER spray. SERIOUSLY worrying".
"Pepper-Spray Redux: Santa Monica Students Sprayed After Protesting Fees
www.alternet.org
Daisy Cheramie shared Suzanne Rogers's photo.
Daisy Cheramie shared Amanda Andrews's photo.
Daisy Cheramie shared Vanessa Glass's photo.
Ivy Jo Cochran shared The Optimism Revolution's photo.
Ivy Jo Cochran shared Ravensgrove Coven's photo.
MAXINE SAYS:
BLUE SAYS:
Have a good evening, everyone. I hope you enjoy today's last update of Web Wanderings. Keep coming back, it's fun. Most of the time, anyway. When I'm not being goaded by my twin sister, Maxine, into indulging in "rants and raves." I'll try to control that a bit better. But no promises. Maxine is a very, very strong influence in my life.
UPDATED 4/5/2012 - 12:00 P.M. PST
A DAY LATE AND A DOLLAR SHORT
California delays its 2012 presidential primary vote
After switching to a February vote in 2008, the state is returning to a June vote.
July 30, 2011|By Anthony York, Los Angeles Times
Reporting from Sacramento -- California's next presidential primary will be one of the last in the nation in 2012 under a law signed Friday by Gov. Jerry Brown.
The move is a reversal of a change lawmakers made leading up to the 2008 presidential election that bumped the state's primary from late spring to February. Moving the primary earlier was intended to allow the state to play a bigger role in selecting the major party nominees. Historically, by the time California voters weighed in, the nominating process was winding down and the presidential primary fights had already been settled.
In making the change, California is joining other cash-strapped states that have decided to forgo the added cost — and any added attention from presidential candidates and the political press corps — by ceding their early spots on the calendar.
Brown administration officials said the measure would save the state millions of dollars by eliminating an extra statewide election. Instead, the presidential contest will be consolidated with the June statewide legislative primaries.
The bill passed through the Legislature with near unanimous support from both Democrats and Republicans.
anthony.york@latimes.com
IMHO: How did I miss this? I just went goggling to see when California was going to have their primary since I couldn't recall hearing anything about it recently but I am seeing lots of new political ads, in particular one for a woman named Stacey Lawson - D running for Congress here in California. I don't know anything about her yet, but I will. [MORE]
THE VOICES OF AMERICA'S WOMEN
Nancy Summers-Long shared The Bitchy Pundit's photo.
Nancy Summers-Long shared Michelle McKinney's photo.
Nancy Summers-Long shared a link: "Let's get the Hammer out. All republican woman hating tea traitors must go.
Vote! Vote! Vote!"
Peter, Paul and Mary - If I Had A Hammerwww.youtube.com
Vote! Vote! Vote!"
Peter, Paul and Mary - If I Had A Hammerwww.youtube.com
Nancy Summers-Long shared The White House's photo.
Nancy Summers-Long shared Lopez Marcela Rojas's photo.
Nancy Summers-Long shared Quotes of Love and Life's photo.
Nancy Summers-Long shared Christ Crew's photo.
IMHO: This has been more fun to update than today's original posting. I hope you enjoy it. I'll be back later this afternoon to update again.
IMHO: Did we? Remember I mean? I got this picture in my e-mail today, 4/5/2012, at 4:57 a.m. I don't remember anything being said yesterday on Facebook about it being the 44th anniversary of the death of Martin Luther King. I didn't realize what day it was yesterday at all. But today I do and I now remember exactly what I was doing on this day, April 5, 1967, 44 years ago.
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. leads a 1965 march in Boston to protest racial imbalances in schools as well as slum housing conditions. (Bettmann / CORBIS / April 4, 2012)
By Rene Lynch
April 4, 2012, 9:40 a.m.
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated 44 years ago today. The somber anniversary will be marked across the country, including with a wreath-laying ceremony at the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tenn., which is on the site where King was fatally shot.
And the new Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial in Washington, D.C., will also mark the anniversary -- its very first, since it just opened to the public last summer -- with a candlelight vigil later this evening.
In the social media world, the anniversary of King's assassination is being noted in a different way -- with a dotted line being drawn between King's assassination and the shooting death of black teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla. "From Martin to Martin: Hoodies up on the Mountaintop," reads the headline at the influential website Global Grind. "Today is Wed, April 4, 2012, the 44th anniv of MLK's death, the 38th day since the murder of #Trayvon Martin -- with no arrest," according to a posting on Twitter.
On April 4, 1968, King was staying at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tenn., preparing a speech he was scheduled to give that night at the nearby Mason Temple. The hotel was one of the few places in the area where blacks were welcome to spend the night, according to the Commercial Appeal, and was a haven on the road for the likes of black celebrities and entertainers such as Ray Charles, Lionel Hampton and Aretha Franklin.
When King stepped out onto the balcony before heading over to the temple, a shot rang out: Assassin James Earl Ray had been lying in wait with a clear view from a nearby boardinghouse. Ray escaped that night but was later captured and convicted of King's death; he spent the remainder of his life insisting that he was innocent and that he was being used as a scapegoat.
King had long been the target of bombings and death threats and had often alluded to a belief that his life would be cut short. In fact, one night earlier, in a speech at the Mason Temple, he told those in attendance: "I may not get there with you, but I want you to know that we as a people will get to the promised land."
The National Civil Rights Museum was built up around the motel where the assassination took place, and visitors can still see the room -- Room 306 -- where King slept. Efforts have been made to preserve it exactly as it was, down to an ashtray filled with cigarettes. The museum will not be open this time next year. Renovations will shut its doors on what would be the 45th anniversary of King's assassination, the Commercial Appeal notes.
Events being held in Memphis to mark the anniversary include a rally organized by the Southern Christian Leadership Council -- an organization that King led until his death -- and the renaming of a street in King's honor.
And at 5:30 p.m. local time, the Rev. Jesse Jackson -- who was with King at the time of the assassination -- will lay a wreath on the balcony near the spot where King was shot.
The candlelight vigil being held in Washington, D.C., will include a number of dignitaries, including Gandhi's grandson, Arun Gandhi.
RANT AND RAVE
IMHO: I've now given you fair warning. This is a ferocious rant and rave section from me and you most likely won't like it. You will feel I am rude and condescending and far too blunt for a woman. You will think I am questioning your commitment to the new wave of the generations-long Women's Rights Movement. You will think I am calling you lackadaisical and far too engrossed in your own personal entertainment in your web browsing to be truly effective in working toward any real political change in the United States. You will feel I am calling you, as women, actually quite misogynist to the point that you cannot be effective in working toward any real political change.
You will be right.
I am saying all of these things to you. I am saying it rudely and bluntly. I am questioning your commitment to a real Women's Rights Movement. I am calling you lackadaisical and far too engrossed in your own personal pleasure while wandering through the vastness of cyberspace. I do think quite a few of you, despite your many words to the contrary, are quite misogynist. And I think the latter because your words are many, but your actions are few.
An example: not too long after his death, a Facebook page was created for Trayvon Martin. It now has 107K "likes". His death has been all over the news, in major newspapers, on nation-wide talk shows, in Marches by thousands protesting his death. Even President Obama spoke about the death of Trayvon Martin, saying if he himself had had a son, his own son would like like Trayvon Martin.
In stark contrast: a young, homeless, black single mother died while in police custody six months ago in St. Louis, Missouri. Some brave soul, six months after this young woman's death, put together a video from the hospital where the young woman was arrested, continued the video through her ride in the police car, then showed her being carried into a cell and dumped on the floor despite the fact there were empty cots in the cell and she could have been put there instead of being dropped to the floor like a useless old dog. The video then shows her death.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER THIS DEATH?
Actually there is a bit of outrage about the death of Anna Brown. In my search on google, using the search words "Anna Brown Death", I did find more articles than I expected. But nothing on the scale of Trayvon Martin. Why?
She was African-American, just like Trayvon. Unlike Trayvon, she was homeless and a single-mother, but does that mean her death should be basically ignored? She most likely was mentally ill. Is that what makes her less deserving of our outrage and anger and activism over her death?
I believe it was because she was a woman. She died because she was a poor, homeless, African-American woman. Plain and simple. And hers is not the only such death in recent years.
"In 2009, Cayne Miceli suffering an asthma attack was dragged away from a New Orlean’s hospital and put into a five point restraint in the Orleans Parish Prison. She was disruptive, fearful and loud, but the medical staff at the jail should have known the immediate threat to her life. She died of hypoxic brain injury, cardiac arrest and asthma, brought on by the horizontal position of her restraint."
Why is it we know the following face but not really the one below it:
You will be right.
I am saying all of these things to you. I am saying it rudely and bluntly. I am questioning your commitment to a real Women's Rights Movement. I am calling you lackadaisical and far too engrossed in your own personal pleasure while wandering through the vastness of cyberspace. I do think quite a few of you, despite your many words to the contrary, are quite misogynist. And I think the latter because your words are many, but your actions are few.
An example: not too long after his death, a Facebook page was created for Trayvon Martin. It now has 107K "likes". His death has been all over the news, in major newspapers, on nation-wide talk shows, in Marches by thousands protesting his death. Even President Obama spoke about the death of Trayvon Martin, saying if he himself had had a son, his own son would like like Trayvon Martin.
In stark contrast: a young, homeless, black single mother died while in police custody six months ago in St. Louis, Missouri. Some brave soul, six months after this young woman's death, put together a video from the hospital where the young woman was arrested, continued the video through her ride in the police car, then showed her being carried into a cell and dumped on the floor despite the fact there were empty cots in the cell and she could have been put there instead of being dropped to the floor like a useless old dog. The video then shows her death.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER THIS DEATH?
Actually there is a bit of outrage about the death of Anna Brown. In my search on google, using the search words "Anna Brown Death", I did find more articles than I expected. But nothing on the scale of Trayvon Martin. Why?
She was African-American, just like Trayvon. Unlike Trayvon, she was homeless and a single-mother, but does that mean her death should be basically ignored? She most likely was mentally ill. Is that what makes her less deserving of our outrage and anger and activism over her death?
I believe it was because she was a woman. She died because she was a poor, homeless, African-American woman. Plain and simple. And hers is not the only such death in recent years.
"In 2009, Cayne Miceli suffering an asthma attack was dragged away from a New Orlean’s hospital and put into a five point restraint in the Orleans Parish Prison. She was disruptive, fearful and loud, but the medical staff at the jail should have known the immediate threat to her life. She died of hypoxic brain injury, cardiac arrest and asthma, brought on by the horizontal position of her restraint."
Why is it we know the following face but not really the one below it:
And who is the woman below? Will the fact that she is a white woman make any difference to you? To the news media? To Barbara Walters? To Whoopie Goldberg? To any of the influential women in our society? It didn't in 2009.
Cayne Miceli, 43, Dies in OPP Jan 5, 2009 Woman dies after spending four hours in five-point restraints at OPP.Link: http://www.nola.com/crime/inde..._jail_re.html
Added by: youthbreakout
Added by: youthbreakout
No, even if she is white, she doesn't matter. She's simply a woman. "Ain't I a woman?" was the rallying cry of Sojurner Truth. But the reality TODAY is that it is dangerous to be a woman in the United States. Even though women are actually the majority, even though women have proven themselves to be as capable as any man in a huge number of fields, even though women have fought for their rights for generations, we are still simply women and we are being killed by institutionalized misogyny every day in one way or another.
And THAT is YOUR fault.
Women are to blame. YOU are to blame. I am to blame. We have not truly risen up against this misogyny.
State Marches? What marches? Is there a nation-wide State Capitol March happening on April 28, 2012? You couldn't prove it by me. I only have original posters for the March for three states, Illinois, Louisiana and Mississippi. The rest of the few State Posters for the March I can find are very generic posters with little information and some don't even have a time. The time is shown as TBD. And we're marching in three weeks? And the founding web site, unitewomen.org, is basically shut down for some reason and has been for days. What's happening?
But guess what? I have a huge, beautiful, beautiful poster for the September March on Washington, DC. In fact, I have three posters for the DC March. And they sure don't look like the State posters.
And THAT is YOUR fault.
Women are to blame. YOU are to blame. I am to blame. We have not truly risen up against this misogyny.
State Marches? What marches? Is there a nation-wide State Capitol March happening on April 28, 2012? You couldn't prove it by me. I only have original posters for the March for three states, Illinois, Louisiana and Mississippi. The rest of the few State Posters for the March I can find are very generic posters with little information and some don't even have a time. The time is shown as TBD. And we're marching in three weeks? And the founding web site, unitewomen.org, is basically shut down for some reason and has been for days. What's happening?
But guess what? I have a huge, beautiful, beautiful poster for the September March on Washington, DC. In fact, I have three posters for the DC March. And they sure don't look like the State posters.
Awesome, aren't they. Whew, beautiful. Now look at a generic State poster for the April 28, 2012 marches on all state capitols.
Now I'll show you some very beautiful State posters created by women in Illinois, Missouri and Louisiana. I know all their names but at least one of them prefers anonymity because of work issues, so I will not post them here. If they e-mail today and let me know they're willing to show their names here, I will do that immediately.
Did you know Illinois had a rally in Springfield on March 29, 2012 because of some very hurtful legislation towards women coming up that day in their State capitol? If not, why not?
These are ALL of the State posters I can find. I went to unitewomen.org and joined ALL the state groups weeks ago to tell them I would be more than happy to post their State posters on womankind. I even have a special link on womankind for the April 28, 2012 Marches. I got banned for spamming. I'd already been banned on Facebook from most of the State organizing pages because I was asking the hard questions. What's happening? Where are posters for the States? I want to hand them out in my small town of Crescent City, California. (I finally created one of my own with the help of a generic from unitewomen.org and you can see it below. Help? Yeah, help all right; spell it B*A*N*N*E*D.
It's pretty pathetic looking because of the low-resolution poster that was provided by unitewomen.org. But I had to hand something out. Not that it's helped. I haven't gotten a single response from any woman in Crescent City even though I have it posted in several places in town.
It's our fault. We probably deserve the war on women being waged against us today. We certainly are not fighting it in any effective, outside of Illinois, at this point in time. We're not talking about it on Facebook outside of the specific April 28, 2012 March Facebook organizing pages and I haven't a clue what is going on there because I've been banned. All I know for sure is that only 3 states responded to my pleas for State posters.
And have you noticed how the State pages are following a red, white and blue theme? That's because originally the March scheduled for the same date in DC said those colors would be a part of their theme. But then the DC March was moved up to September and they have professionally created posters that are NOT in red, white and blue.
I have some questions and I've already asked them of Erin Nanasi, the original founder of the April 28, 2012 State marches, her assistant, Jenni Siri, and of Kathy Teegarden, now the leader of the April Marches at unitewomen.org, but none of my questions were ever really answered by any of them. I wonder why?
WHERE ARE THE STATE POSTERS FOR THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
WHERE IS THE PUBLICITY FOR THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
WHO IS EVEN TALKING NATION-WIDE ABOUT THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
HAS ANYBODY FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE MARCH ORGANIZING TALKED WITH BETTINA APTHEKER, ANGELA DAVIS, TO SENATORS BARBARA BOXER OR DIANE FEINSTEIN OR ANY OF THE MANY OTHER INFLUENTIAL WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA?
ANYBODY TALKED TO WHOOPIE GOLDBERG OR BARBARA WALTERS?
DO ANY OF THESE WOMEN EVEN KNOW THERE IS SUPPOSED TO BE A MARCH ON THEIR STATE CAPITOL OF SACRAMENTO ON APRIL 28, 2012?
HAVE ANY OF THESE WOMEN ENDORSED THE APRIL 28, 2012 MARCH?
WHAT IS HAPPENING? WE ONLY HAVE 23 DAYS LEFT BEFORE WE MARCH.
ARE WE MARCHING?
I WAS BORN IN MISSOURI (true fact), SO SHOW ME SOMETHING IS HAPPENING ON APRIL 28, 2012.
WHEN YOU DO, IF YOU DO, I WILL SHUT UP!
Whew, end of rant. But before I go, do you remember today's first post?
It's our fault. We probably deserve the war on women being waged against us today. We certainly are not fighting it in any effective, outside of Illinois, at this point in time. We're not talking about it on Facebook outside of the specific April 28, 2012 March Facebook organizing pages and I haven't a clue what is going on there because I've been banned. All I know for sure is that only 3 states responded to my pleas for State posters.
And have you noticed how the State pages are following a red, white and blue theme? That's because originally the March scheduled for the same date in DC said those colors would be a part of their theme. But then the DC March was moved up to September and they have professionally created posters that are NOT in red, white and blue.
I have some questions and I've already asked them of Erin Nanasi, the original founder of the April 28, 2012 State marches, her assistant, Jenni Siri, and of Kathy Teegarden, now the leader of the April Marches at unitewomen.org, but none of my questions were ever really answered by any of them. I wonder why?
WHERE ARE THE STATE POSTERS FOR THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
WHERE IS THE PUBLICITY FOR THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
WHO IS EVEN TALKING NATION-WIDE ABOUT THE APRIL 28, 2012 STATE MARCHES?
HAS ANYBODY FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE MARCH ORGANIZING TALKED WITH BETTINA APTHEKER, ANGELA DAVIS, TO SENATORS BARBARA BOXER OR DIANE FEINSTEIN OR ANY OF THE MANY OTHER INFLUENTIAL WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA?
ANYBODY TALKED TO WHOOPIE GOLDBERG OR BARBARA WALTERS?
DO ANY OF THESE WOMEN EVEN KNOW THERE IS SUPPOSED TO BE A MARCH ON THEIR STATE CAPITOL OF SACRAMENTO ON APRIL 28, 2012?
HAVE ANY OF THESE WOMEN ENDORSED THE APRIL 28, 2012 MARCH?
WHAT IS HAPPENING? WE ONLY HAVE 23 DAYS LEFT BEFORE WE MARCH.
ARE WE MARCHING?
I WAS BORN IN MISSOURI (true fact), SO SHOW ME SOMETHING IS HAPPENING ON APRIL 28, 2012.
WHEN YOU DO, IF YOU DO, I WILL SHUT UP!
Whew, end of rant. But before I go, do you remember today's first post?
"In the end, we will remember not the words
of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
~Martin Luther King
of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
~Martin Luther King
Have a great day, everyone, if you can, and I'll be back later today with updates for Web Wanderings.